Automation with npm run Scripts

Automation with npm run Scripts

Python has several ways to register custom scripts to execute during development in a workspace. In this section we look at npm run scripts, registered in package.json, for centralizing repeatable frontend tasks.

Overview

  • Explain npm run scripts in the scripts block of package.json
  • Install a linter and hook into an npm run script
  • Show how PyCharm puts a friendly face on such task scripts
  • Explain the subtle benefit to npm run as a uniform interface

Python Command Line Scripts

Let’s say you have some tasks you do frequently during development:

  • Run a linter to check for errors or style warnings
  • Start a development server
  • Run tests
  • Package a release and publish to PyPi

You’d like to save yourself some work by automating these steps. Even better, you are on a development team and you’d like the automation to be in a natural, easily-discoverable place.

In Python...well, this is a lesser-known neighborhood. Python has two main facilities for command-line scripts:

  • Use setuptools cmdclass to register a command that can be run as an argument to setup.py, for example python setup.py lint
  • Register a console script to be added into your Python or virtualenv’s bin directory

These approaches suffer from some of the historical baggage of distutils and setuptools, plus they are a bit clunky. As such, you don’t often encounter them at the beginner or intermediate level in Python.

Let’s take a look at how to approach this in the frontend world.

npm run scripts

As mentioned in the package.json intro article, the package.json configuration file can contain more than just package name and dependency information.

Let’s take a look at the auto-generated package.json file from the the ESLint article:

Earlier ESLint package.json
{
  "name": "pylyglot",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "description": "Series of articles for Polyglot Python with PyCharm",
  "main": "index.js",
  "scripts": {
    "test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1"
  },
  "repository": {
    "type": "git",
    "url": "git+ssh://git@github.com/pauleveritt/pauleveritt.github.io.git"
  },
  "author": "Paul Everitt",
  "license": "ISC",
  "bugs": {
    "url": "https://github.com/pauleveritt/pauleveritt.github.io/issues"
  },
  "homepage": "https://github.com/pauleveritt/pauleveritt.github.io#readme",
  "devDependencies": {
    "eslint": "^1.10.3"
  }
}

By default, npm init created a scripts section in your package file. In there, it registered one “run command”: a test command. With that package.json file, you could execute the echo command via npm:

$ npm run test
Screenshot npm run test

Note how similar this command’s structure looks to Python’s python setup.py test: an executable, followed by an argument, followed by the custom, plugged-in target.

As explained in the npm run documentation, certain script values such as test are pre-defined as a discoverable interface, such as test, start, etc. For these, we can skip run and just say:

$ npm test

For these certain, common tasks, you can walk up to a package and run npm <taskname>, knowing that the project wired up that task to do the task with some working implementation.

Linting, Revisited

We can now register a script, both to simplify running our linter but to also advertise this task to people that use our project. Let’s replace the (unimplemented) test entry in package.json with a script for lint:

npm run package.json
{
  "name": "pylyglot",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "description": "Series of articles for Polyglot Python with PyCharm",
  "main": "index.js",
  "scripts": {
    "lint": "eslint app1.js"
  },
  "repository": {
    "type": "git",
    "url": "git+ssh://git@github.com/pauleveritt/pauleveritt.github.io.git"
  },
  "author": "Paul Everitt",
  "license": "ISC",
  "bugs": {
    "url": "https://github.com/pauleveritt/pauleveritt.github.io/issues"
  },
  "homepage": "https://github.com/pauleveritt/pauleveritt.github.io#readme",
  "devDependencies": {
    "eslint": "^1.10.3"
  }
}

Presuming we still have the same .eslintrc file configured:

.eslintrc
{
  "rules": {
    "quotes": [
      1,
      "single"
    ]
  }
}

...then we can now run our linter from the command line in a simplified, predicatable way:

$ npm run lint

This gives the same resulting eslint output from the previous article:

Screenshot npm run lint

Not in our scripts block that we didn’t have to specify the full path to node_modules/.bin/eslint. When you run a script with npm run, node_modules/.bin is added to the path automatically. Also note that npm run scripts don’t have to be JavaScript files: as we saw in the boilerplate test command, it ran the system echo command.

As you can see, this approach is far simpler and more “first class” than Python automation. It still has rough edges. But it works naturally for the basics.

PyCharm Automation

Because there is a central place to look for tasks, PyCharm can put a UI on finding and running these tasks. Right-click on your package.json file and you will see a menu option for Show npm scripts. You then get a panel showing the registered run scripts. Double-clicking them runs that script in a tool window:

This workflow is very helpful. It’s nice to have the npm tool window to browse your tasks, and of course, running a task in its own run window is far better than running in the console.

Note

If you edit the scripts in package.json, you’ll have to click the reload button in npm tool window.

The Subtle Benefit

Certainly when compared to Python’s approach to registering task scripts, finding them, and running them, this npm run script approach is quite nice. It’s dead simple to make and use and eliminates needing to type the full path. It can run tasks implemented in JavaScript or any kind of executable on your path. As such, it eliminates much of the need for task automation frameworks such as gulp or grunt.

There is, though, a more subtle benefit. Your project now advertises certain tasks it implements, registered with simple names, in configuration data file, and in a predictable, standard location. Even more, certain common task names are pre-defined. Choosing to implement these means certain workflows, expected by tools like TravisCI, have a “uniform interface”, similar to the benefit we get from the HTTP and REST uniform interface.

Because tasks are in a data file in a predictable place, tools such as PyCharm can scan, list, and launch your project’s tasks.

Wrapup

In this article we introduced task automation via npm run scripts registered in our package configuration file. We hooked up our linter command to an automation script and showed the convenience PyCharm adds for task automation.

Comments

comments powered by Disqus